No Image Available


Read more from TrainingZone

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1705321608055-0’); });

Email worst way to communicate with customers


Slow, poor quality email responses are failing UK customers – and the problem is getting worse, as email is revealed as the UK’s worst channel for customer service, according to research from eService provider Transversal.

Transversal’s third annual multi-channel customer service study has uncovered a growing crisis in email response: emailing customer service staff is markedly less effective at yielding a satisfactory answer than using an automated online system or phoning a contact centre. Less than half (46 per cent) of the routine customer service questions emailed to 100 leading organisations were answered adequately.

Additionally, the average time to respond to email was nearly four days (46 hours), with 28 per cent of organisations not even replying at all. However, proving that fast, accurate responses by email are possible, some companies responded with useful answers within 10 minutes. Overall these figures show a major deterioration since 2006, when email successfully answered 60 per cent of queries and kept customers waiting less time – on average 33 hours - for a reply.

Transversal’s study evaluated 100 leading UK companies in the banking, telecoms, insurance, travel, consumer electronics, grocery retail, fashion retail, CD/DVD retail, consumer electronics retail and utilities sectors for their ability to answer simple routine questions via email, their website and by phone. While websites averaged five out of 10 correct responses and 55 per cent of phone calls were answered within two minutes, email responses continue to deteriorate year on year.

“Our research has uncovered shocking failings in the customer service email channel,” commented Dee Roche, director of marketing, Transversal. “Companies are playing ping pong with email enquiries, pushing them back to the web or forcing consumers to call contact centres. What is the point in paying staff to respond to customers’ questions badly? With consumers increasingly demanding personalised service, email should be at the forefront of delivering tailored responses that help convert browsers into customers. Some organisations are doing this extremely well but the general picture is of lazy, generic replies – if companies eventually respond.”

Analysis of responses show that too many companies simply use email to push customers to other channels rather than even attempting to provide a useful answer. The majority (63 per cent) of inadequate replies directed customers to call a contact centre, while nearly half (48 per cent) pushed customers back to the website where they started, normally to generic web pages that didn’t answer the question. Not only does this increase customer dissatisfaction but multiplies the number of contacts consumers need to make, with many having to telephone to resolve their enquiry.

The usefulness of email replies has deteriorated year on year in 80 per cent of sectors. Even though many have improved response times, this appears to be through sacrificing effectiveness of replies.

“Our analysis demonstrates the scale of this problem and how dramatically the usefulness of email replies has deteriorated over the last three years," said Roche. "There seems to be a lack of monitoring of the quality of responses, with a narrow focus on agents answering questions to hit service level targets rather than spending the time to properly resolve customer queries. With many contact centres outsourced this also has a financial aspect – companies that are paid a set amount for every email answered have no incentive to ensure agents are providing detailed, useful responses. Equally, contact centre managers targeted purely on numbers don’t have a remit in their jobs to monitor content. Organisations need to take a step back and overhaul their processes to ensure that the email channel is providing what customers want and need”

Organisations also need to aim to reduce the sheer volume of email they receive, he said. A key way to accomplish this, he suggests, is to allow customers to first ask their questions through a customer service knowledgebase on their website. If customers then go on to email from the knowledgebase, the agent will be able to see what they have searched for – there is then no excuse for sending customers back to the same website pages.

For more information on the study go to


Get the latest from TrainingZone.

Elevate your L&D expertise by subscribing to TrainingZone’s newsletter! Get curated insights, premium reports, and event updates from industry leaders.


Thank you!