Author Profile Picture

Sudhakar I. Prabu


Leadership Coach, Leadership Development Consultant, Performance Improvement Consultant

Read more from Sudhakar I. Prabu

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1705321608055-0’); });

How to address conflicts and avoid crisis?


In an organization where people work together differences/conflicts are possible and natural. Conflicts are not negative, the way it is handled is what produces negative impacts. Conflicts can be used constructively, if it is handled properly.

We live in a world where every one thinks and acts differently, we do not perceive the same in the same way. Therefore, differences bound to arise from time to time on various matters that are expressed through various ways. Every time when situation arise where differences are being identified, they must be addressed and an appropriate resolution must be reached that leads to desirable action. Failure to address differences will eventually lead to crisis and undesirable consequences.

In an organization crisis situation does not arise over night. In most cases, differences has been there for a period of time, neglected, left unattended, storing negative energies, which eventually bound to bust one day. When it does happen those responsible are surprised, "how this could have happened?" In fact, one should be surprised, how come people just left this unnoticed, unattended that has become so big a crisis now.

( To Know more about 3 Day Leadership Effectiveness Workshop Facilitated by Sudhakar I. Prabu Click Here or visit )

Two areas that can lead to conflict

In an organization there are two areas which can result in differences, if not attended will result in a full blown conflict.

First one is related to objections, and expressions. In an organization, employees are asked to follow performance standards, procedures, process, policies, and acceptable work behaviors that an organization has set for employees to adhere to while at work. When an employee or group of employees do not follow the standards or do things in the way they would like to do, for what so ever the reason - which can be the cause, difference arise.

The severity of the problem situation depends on how seriously employees feel about how they want to do things that contradicts what is being suggested by the management.

The second area is related to expectations. Difference in expectations arise when, what is being offered does not meet what is being expected. Employees may have certain expectations related, their expectations may be related to changes required in certain stringent policies, leadership and management practices, work environment, compensations and benefits, other privileges , and the likes. When they are not adequacy met differences arise.

The severity of problem situation depends on the perceived gap between what is being offered and what is being expected. Wider the gap is, the stronger the employees feel about the differences.

Managing Differences and Avoiding Crisis

In an organization equilibration must be maintained between management meeting employees expectations and employees executing what management have asked them to. It is possible that the equilibrium can be affected for various reasons. To deal with that an organization must continually engage in identify potential areas where differences could arise, understanding the differences, address them as soon as possible. An organization may use both formal and informal means to reach better understanding of the concerns of all parties included and reach a resolution, which leads to desirable action.

It is evident that when differences are not addressed properly it gives birth to conflict. Conflict, when not handled properly, gives way to crisis situation that may lead to economic loss. Therefore, differences must be addressed properly to avoid conflict; conflict must be handled properly to avert a crisis situation. A conflict must be handled properly to have constructive impact on the organization.

How to resolve differences/conflicts Effectively?

1. Proactive measure to prevent unwanted situations:

Prevention is better than cure. Never wait for the situation to arise in which you will have to address difference because it has become so obvious. Take preventive approach and plan ways and means that will lead to better understanding and awareness among employees on various matters that can lead to difference.

Take proactive measures to identify potential areas where employees can develop differences. Develop mechanisms, through which employees can participate and freely express their opinions and differences. Encourage and engage in a collaborative process through which differences can be addressed and resolved at the earliest.

Proactive measure that is prevention in nature must be an ongoing process. It is not a one time solution or situation specific. It must be part of the essential functioning of an organization.

2. Cold War Situations

At times every body knows whats going under the cover, no one is willing to talk that out in open. In their own groups and closed doors they are discussing about the issues and differences. But, out in open they pretend to be nice and manage to continue to make it appear to be normal and business as usual. This is a time bomb situation; no body knows what is going to happen, if something will happen, when its going to happen.

When you recognize such situation, instead of wasting time, take measure to reduce tension. take measures to build trust and confidence among the people involved so that they can engage in meaningful discussions. Set up task teams that can look into the issues and differences involved, identify the root cause and propose solutions that are acceptable to all parties involved.

When you have a situation in which people know the tension that is building each moment, its just a matter of time things are going to be out of control. In such a situation, even the little action can have a greater impact on the outcome of the situation. to reduce tension, create an environment that encourages openness, transparency, expression of opinions, assurance, respect and acceptance for one another. More importantly an environment in which every one listen to one another and take effort to understand the other person's view point.

Don't play wait and watch. Don't expect difference to disappear on its own. don't assume as time goes on things will be taken care of in it self. you may be wasting valuable time for bridging the gap instead of waiting for things to be blown out of proportion.

Don't bust the bubble and make things worst. When you know the tension is mounting each moment, don't act irrationally and bust the bubble that will result in out burst of emotions or leading to a situation in which you loose control of the situation. The goal must be to keep things under control so that differences and issues can be addressed through proper channels and the situation remains within the limits of manageability.

You would never want to be in a situation in which things are out of your control and you are a mere spectator. As long as you problem situation is under control it is possible to influence the outcome of the situation.

Avoid Blame Game. Instead of blaming each other or pointing finger at each other, all parties concerned must work towards building consensus, reaching a amicable resolution that will lead to a desirable action. Address real issues and emphasis on what is good for all parties involved and put the interest of organization a priority.

Understand influential players who's opinions influence others in the organization. Deal with then in a manner that establishes understanding, establish common goals that affects every one involved as well as puts the best interest of the organization. Build an awareness among every one how individual aspirations affects and impacts on the outcome of the situation. This must be done delicately, not in a manner that threatens the self-image and public-image of those individuals. Do not engage in divisive politics, later on it may boomerang on you.

3. Emerging differences - initial stage

Don't act based on assumption. Do not take it for granted that employees bound to have differences in certain areas and start addressing those issues. Take time to collect facts and causes for difference before planing and seeking solution. When you act based on assumptions you may try to resolve non existent issues and leaving out the real issues untouched.

Use existing organizational mechanism to address issues. Strengthen the mechanism where it need to be in order to win the trust and confidence of all parties involved. If there is a need be, create new mechanisms to address issues. However make sure all parties involved be aware of how it is going to work, how they can get involved and make a useful contribution.

The earlier the differences are addressed the easier it is to reach a resolution. The longer it takes to address the differences and reach a resolution, that mush efforts and time it will take to built healthy post resolutions work relationships.

4. Reconciliation process

Process through which differences are being addressed and resolution is being sought must be a collaborative process in which every one works together build consensus. when Every one involved work together to address differences and agree to seek common ground, and put the best interest of the organization, the process itself will serve as a tool for building teams. when they reach a resolution they are more likely to work together and mate things work.

Form committee or a team to address the differences and recommend solutions. In such case the composition of team itself is a crucial. For the very people who are suppose to suggest solutions are not accepted by the employees how their recommendations will be accepted by the employees. It is important give equal representation for all parties involved. Get those people in the committee who's suggestions and recommendations will have value and standing among the employees involved.

Don't act like a disciplinarian. When you recognize differences, don't try to dominate the employees and impose your decision on them. Instead engage in a dialog and and initiate process that increases understanding and voluntary acceptance of what is good for the common good of all parties involved. Resolve issues through corroborative process instead of imposing decision on the others involved.

Don't appear to be deliberately inactive and insensitive. When you are in a situations where both parties recognize the difference and willing to seek a resolution, watch out for the ways in which you conduct yourself. You don't want to be perceived as deliberately avoiding action or being overly insensitive. Such conduct may result in provoking people to reach negatively.

Be genuine in brining a resolution. If either party is not genuine about reaching a resolution, there is no point keep on discussing about issues. At some point in time it will become obvious, you cant hide this from the other for very long. If every one involved in the reconciliatory proceed genuinely seeking a solution, it will have profound impact on the outcome of the process.

Don't manipulate others to do what you want. Never use reconciliatory process as a tool to buy time or squeezing the other to do what you want to do. You may succeed in the short-term, on the long-term you may loose. It is important to build trust and understanding during the reconciliatory process, without listening and understanding each others concerns one can not reach a resolution that will lead to desirable action. Don't force your decision on the others, instead enhance understanding and awareness to reach decision based on mutual consent. When they are part of the decision making, they more likely to own the decision they have reached.

Unless proper mechanisms are not build, through which each parties express their concerns and issues the effort to bring a resolution is unlikely to happen. The mechanisms should create a free and fair environment in which all parties involved are able to share their concerns openly, listen to one another's concerns, bridge and build better understanding among every one.

Common ground will emerge when every one involved in the process seek and focused on what is best for the organization. Explore how an individual or groups expectations and aspirations can be met through seeking what is good for the organization. Organization is the middle ground which bridges individuals, not meeting the expectations and aspirations of certain individuals.

5. Reaching Resolution

A resolution is a must. When a difference is being identified and recognized that may lead to a undesirable situation the means through which the difference are to be addressed is important at the same time all parties involved must reach a resolution. A resolution that will lead to desirable action. A resolution that both parties arrived through the reconciliatory process that both parties own it. Unless all parties involved do not own the resolution they have reached, they are not likely to act based on the resolution.

6. Walk the Talk

Resolution is a start and not an end. Action must follow the resolution. If resolutions are not backed up with action, it will lead to lack of trust and shatter confidence. All parties must walk the talk to build more trust, understanding, and confidence in each other.

At times Post resolution situation can be very uncomfortable. The management must take initiative to ensure that employees feel comfortable. Employees must not made to feel they are being targeted because of their actions in the pre-resolution period.

Author Profile Picture
Sudhakar I. Prabu

Leadership Coach, Leadership Development Consultant, Performance Improvement Consultant

Read more from Sudhakar I. Prabu

Get the latest from TrainingZone.

Elevate your L&D expertise by subscribing to TrainingZone’s newsletter! Get curated insights, premium reports, and event updates from industry leaders.

Thank you!