Author Profile Picture

Steve Robson

Marine Industry

Learning and Development Consultant

Read more from Steve Robson

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1705321608055-0’); });

Bloom’s Taxonomy

default-16x9

I have a poster of Bloom's Taxonomy and have over written "Understanding" with "Comprehending"

No particular reason other than it "feels" better.

Am I wrong to do this and why...answers on a postcard.

Thanks

One Response

  1. I think as learners and in

    I think as learners and in scenarios where we are managed we're so used to being asked if we "understand" something as a leading question, to which we answer Yes! That I understand where you are coming from.

    I think when phrasing objectives it's often easy to put "to understand" at the begining of an objective without thinking about what builds up to that understanding. I think the word comprehend has a deeper meaning in that sense and encourages us to think about the constituate parts of the process.

    I don't think it matters paticularly which word we use as long as we don't close off ourselves and our learners to considering all the elements need to fully understand something and present these alongside the appropriate broader "understanding"

    Aleks

Author Profile Picture
Steve Robson

Learning and Development Consultant

Read more from Steve Robson
Newsletter

Get the latest from TrainingZone.

Elevate your L&D expertise by subscribing to TrainingZone’s newsletter! Get curated insights, premium reports, and event updates from industry leaders.

Thank you!