99.9% of people getting this one wrong apparently.
I thought it was easier than the other one..
3 = 18
4 = 32
5 = 50
6 = 72
7 = 98
10 = ?
Menu
Menu
99.9% of people getting this one wrong apparently.
I thought it was easier than the other one..
3 = 18
4 = 32
5 = 50
6 = 72
7 = 98
10 = ?
Leaders need to stop the self-sacrifice cycle
Middle management’s biggest challenge
Unlocking courage
8 Responses
Easy…
160
more numbers
200
Lovin the numbers”
200
numbers
200
numbers
200 = 2x (10 squared)
new numbers
160 isnt it?
x 6, x 8, x 10, etc?
numbers
Tricksy. Could be 160 or 200 as both rules work.
New numbers …
I make it 200, but my head is starting to hurt now!!