No Image Available

Garry Platt

EEF

Senior Consultant

Read more from Garry Platt

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1705321608055-0’); });

Online better than face-to-face (Meta Analysis)

default-16x9

The recent meta analysis published in the United States which many e based promoters have alighted upon with alacrity, including; Clive Shepherd; http://clive-shepherd.blogspot.com/2009/10/evaluation-of-evidence-based-practices.html#links and Donald Clark; https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=21077063&postID=5447007466528519217 The report is promoted as evidence of how e based learning is the saviour of the true learner whilst class room based learning is the chronic sick boy of the learning pack unless used in a blended setting. However, I looked in some detail at the content rather that just the attention grabbing headlines and I duly downloaded the cited report from here: http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf When I started to read the report and how this analysis was put together and the studies upon which this report has been based the conclusions some of the e based promoters have chosen to select start to lose some of their gravitas. So in response I began to write up some of my concerns and wondered if anyone else had done the same, I discovered they had and probably the best analysis of this report can be seen here: http://www.brainfriendlytrainer.com/reflect/busting-the-myth-that-e-learning-is-more-effective-than-face-to-face

One Response

  1. Thanks Gary

    Really glad you liked my take on the e-learning report.

    I must admit that I felt a bit ‘dirty’ writing it as I’m a huge fan of using web technologies to help organisations and learners achieve their desired outcomes. I just hate it when things are mis-represented and wanted to balance the overstament and misinterpretation *some* people were allocating to the research.

    Since reading Ben Golacres book "Bad Science" I’ve been questioning everything that begins "research says…" ūüôā

    It’s interesting that over the last few months there have been a few cases of ‘established research’ being questioned. The recent interview on the BBC by Mehrabian putting us straight about his 55%/38%/7% research is a case in point.

    Cheers
    Ally

    PS… on a personal note, I really appreciate your link to our blog. We’ve only been live for 11 weeks and are really chuffed to be noticed for the articles we are writing!


    I blog at http://www.brainfriendlytrainer.com
    Follow me on twitter at http://www.twitter.com/cheekturner
    Hook up with me at LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/allymcc

     

No Image Available
Garry Platt

Senior Consultant

Read more from Garry Platt
Newsletter

Get the latest from TrainingZone.

Elevate your L&D expertise by subscribing to TrainingZone’s newsletter! Get curated insights, premium reports, and event updates from industry leaders.

 

Thank you!